Language and Personality

There is an effect when speaking a foreign language that I think isn't talked about as much as it should be. The fact that, when speaking in another language, one takes on a slightly different personality than when speaking in their native tongue. I've noticed the effect of this in many different contexts.

I'm a native English speaker, and I've studied many languages to varying levels. But with the German language I got to the highest level and I can understand most conversations. I noticed eventually that I acted differently when speaking German, but I also noticed the converse. I worked with mostly German colleagues, but the working language was English. So my colleagues were used to the fact that usually when they were speaking English it was about work and therefore more serious. Conversely, when at work they would sometimes speak German with each other when a non-German speaker wasn't involved. Since I could understand what they were saying, I routinely noticed that they were more casual with each other. This is surely partly because they can just speak more freely in their native tongue, but I also got the sense that it was psychological, meaning in German they could access a larger range of their personality.

Being now in a multi-lingual marriage, I am interested in how multiple languages effect the raising of children. Without citing anything, I have read that children develop fine with up to three languages, but having four or more at a very young age can slow development. An example scenario with three languages is two parents each speaking to the child in their native tongue, and one more being learned and used at school. It also supposedly helps if one parent always speaks a consistent language with the children. I would guess that one of the reasons that this method is preferred is that the child can consistently develop their intelligence and personality in each language without getting them confused.

One last phenomenon I can propose has to do with language learning for adults. If one has a different personality when speaking different languages, then it also must be that they have to develop this separate personality when learning a new language. I have gotten the sense when watching others try to speak a foreign language that they are apprehensive to take on this new personality, and it hurts their ability to speak well. The most simple way to explain this is putting on a thick French accent when trying to speak French, rather than just saying French words as they would be said in American English. Of course as one would learn French more and more the accent would become more natural, but in the beginning stages the accent is more like playing a role, and I think that some people hesitate to take on that role. The extension for an advanced speaker would be using more phrases and colloquialisms in the foreign language. Sometimes they don't make sense when directly translated, and are a result of different cultural forces, but from just a language point of view they are useful for better communication.

In any case, I think some people would not even agree with the basic premise that when speaking a different language we take on a slightly different personality. But I have seen it and experienced it myself, and I think it actually can explain some aspects of language learning and use.

A Grand Canyon - Bryce Canyon - Zion Itinerary

We just went on a great hiking trip for 5 days out West. Our itinerary worked out so nicely that I though it worth writing down.


Day 0:
10pm - arrive to Vegas, pickup rental car

Day 1:
8am - pickup rented tent and stove
9am - drive 4 hours to Grand Canyon NP, stop at historic Route 66 along the way
3pm - hike 1.5 miles down and then back up on Bright Angel Trail (~2.5 hours)
7pm - Ride shuttle to see sunset at Hermit's Rest
9pm - dinner at campsite

Day 2:
5am - wake up, see sunrise at Mather Point
6am - hike 1.5 miles down and back up on South Kaibab Trail (~3 hours)
10am - Drive 3 hours to Lake Powell
1pm - Boat tour on Lake Powell (2.5 hours)
6pm - swim a bit at the Lake Powell beach
9pm - dinner at campsite

Day 3:
10am - take some time to drive slowly to Bryce Canyon, take scenic route
3pm - hike 6 mile figure-eight Trail (~3 hours) starting at Sunset Point

Day 4:
6am - wake up, see sunrise at Sunrise Point
6:30am - hike 8 mile Fairyland Loop Trail counterclockwise (3.5 hours)
10am - Second breakfast and nap
11am - drive 2 hours to Zion NP
1pm - rent gear for the Narrows hike
3pm - Enter Zion NP, take shuttle to Narrows
4pm - Hike the narrows to Wall street and back (~2.5 hours)
9pm - dinner

Day 5:
6am - wake up
7am - be in line for first park shuttle
7:30 - Do full Angel's Landing hike (~2.5 hours)
11am - in Springdale, pay for showers, have coffee, eat snacks
12pm - drive to Saint George, shopping in Red Cliff's Mall
4pm - drive back to Vegas
6pm - return rented camping gear
7pm - dinner
8pm - spend two hours in Vegas, win $29
10pm - be back at airport, return rental car
11:45pm - flight back to the East Coast


The biggest thing I would add to this trip, which we didn't have time for, was actually hiking down to the Colorado river in the Grand Canyon. This is something I have never done, and is on my bucket list, but would require two more days on the trip.

2017 Reading List Reflections

I made a reading list a year ago, mostly in reaction to Tr*mp entering the white house, and the implications I thought that had on the US and the world. I didn't read everything on the list, but what I did read left a lasting impression.

It Can't Happen Here - Sinclair Lewis (1935)
This was quite a surprise, both because of how similar it sounded to Tr*mp at the time I was reading it, and how realistic it seemed. Interestingly enough it is pretty closely based on a real (but short-lived) political movement of that time. Highly recommended.

Brave New World - Aldous Huxley (1931)
A classic that I essentially already knew about because of its presence in pop-culture. It was a great and easy read, and lived up to its popularity.

Between the World and Me - Ta-Nehisi Coates (2015)
Was not on the list, but fit in very well. Prose written like poetry, this work made me feel the visceral emotions that Coates felt growing up, and that he fears his son will too. Also a short read from a current talent that should be on every reading list, if not just for it's beauty, but it's ability to teach.

Hillbilly Elegy - J. D. Vance (2016) 
This was surprisingly good, a memoir from a self-described Kentucky/Ohio hillbilly about his very rough and troubled childhood. So many of the superficial facts I had seen so much growing up in others, but Vance brought me in to the experience in so much more detail. He does a great job at both critiquing those he was surrounded by, but also crying out for all of those left behind by unreasonable and nonsensical government policies.

Islam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue - Sam Harris, Maajid Nawaz (2015)
I am a fan of Sam Harris, although he can sometimes take a too-literal, or too-academic point of view, I almost always agree with the logic of his arguments. This is a great short dialogue between Harris, an atheist writer and thinker, and Nawaz, a former Islamic fundamentalist and current reform voice in the UK. Very interesting, and it helps me understand more details about the Islamic faith, and the issues facing the modern world and the billion muslims living in it.


Globalization and Its Discontents - Joseph E. Stiglitz (2017) 
I ended up reading the new 2017 version of this book, which includes a new introduction and an extensive section on the "new discontents", which are those in developed countries. I guess this is the textbook-like complement to Hillbilly Elegy, outlining the economic reasoning behind how globalization poorly managed hurts those in the countries it is supposed to help most (developing countries) and even those in the countries with the most power and control (the US). He rallies intensely against the IMF, which can sometimes seem like cherry-picking. And although his arguments make a lot of sense to me, I wish he would also discuss how he fit in, since he also had huge influence during a lot of the time periods he speaks about.


What It Takes: The Way to the White House - Richard Ben Cramer (1992)
I must admit that I never finished this 1000+ page tome, but did get more than half way through. The point however is already strongly made. In modern times the president (in this case George Bush Sr.) need not be smart or good with the issues, but just be friends with everybody. The '88 campaign had a vast media involvement, and in the end a very dirty ad war against Dukakis sealed the deal. It does make one sentimental for the time when President's were all skilled elder-statesmen, but at the same time the media involvement has huge positives on the democratic process. In any case, running for president will take over ever facet of your life. 

---- 

What I didn't read:  

Trump: The Art of the Deal and Crippled America: How to Make America Great Again. I couldn't bring myself to pay money for, or spend any time reading words even supposed to have been written by him. 

An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States and Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil are still both on my list as nonfiction, and The Sellout in fiction. 

----

 My list for this coming year includes finally finishing one of Thomas Pynchon's longer works (either V, Gravity's Rainbow, or Inherent Vice), and attempting Infinite Jest by David Foster Wallace. I am riding a bit of a nonfiction streak, so we'll see what else falls under my view.

Learning two languages at once?

I want to expand upon the topic of language learning, inspired yet again by fluentin3months.com, this time by a specific post 'Learning Two Languages at Once: Can You Learn Multiple Languages at the Same Time?'

For a period of about one year I was learning German, progressing from beginner to intermediate, at the same time as beginning from scratch with the Croatian language. I've been living in Hamburg, Germany for three years now and wanted to learn the language for obvious reasons; to communicate and connect better with friends, colleagues, and everyday people. My girlfriend is from Croatia, so in part because of raw curiosity, but also to gain the ability to communicate with her family and friends, I started to learn from zero.

German had gone quite well even without an official course, mostly because I live in Germany and had a support structure to give me the opportunity to practice. Also, I was quite motivated so my self-study worked. Croatian on the other hand floundered for months, and is still only progressing slowly since I have time for only one one-hour long Skype course per week. Still, I feel like I really learned something for that period of time where I was learning two languages at once. I am heading in to a period where I will probably need to draw on these skills again. I am moving to Paris, France, and will probably want to pick up at least basic French and at least slowly continue with Croatian, albeit both with less urgency than before.

The article, written by Benny Lewis, the founder of the site, lists five things that I could not agree with more:

1. Choose languages that are really different
2. Study both languages each day
3. Avoid multi-tasking
4. Give each language a unique study routine
5. Don't rush!

These are absolute gold, and took me months to figure out myself. The most important I found was to really practically separate the way that you study each language. Don't study them in the same place, or at the same time of day. For the period I was studying German and Croatian I only studied German in the mornings before work, and only studied Croatian in the evenings after work. One example was listening to a German podcast on the way to work (Echo des Tages from NDR), and a Croatian one on the way home (actually from Serbia because there are no Croatian pods available, Srbija u dva). I would have loved to study each every day, but didn't have the discipline to do so, even for a small amount of time.

I hope this is useful. Just like Benny says, it is probably not possible or recommendable to try to become fluent in two languages at once, and it's also hard to imagine that being necessary for many people. But brushing up or slowly improving skills in two languages at once is something that many people probably wish they could do. It is definitely possible, just try to set these guidelines first so the time is well spent.

How long does it really take to learn a language?

I have become more and more interested in learning languages since moving to Europe. I studied German (hopelessly) in high school, and studied Japanese in college, but since moving to Germany over three years ago I have come to truly enjoy it. I have gotten to an upper-intermediate level in German mostly via self-study and immersion, and have started learning Croatian since it's the native tongue of my girlfriend. With an upcoming move to Paris and therefore French learning on the horizon I'm actually motivated rather than intimidated.

Along my journey of getting interested in languages I have many times clicked on fluentin3months.com, where Benny The Irish Polyglot (and now a team of bloggers) talk about the fun of language learning. His philosophy, outlined in his language hacking guides, is that book learning is over-rated and the best tactic is to speak from day one. He is absolutely right, and has proven it during many of his language challenges where he travels to a location and attempts to get to a certain level in his first 3 months there. What I have learned however is that book learning is very useful and important, but passion (and the hard work and determination that comes with it) is even more directly important. Book learning often drains passion, so it is only indirectly over-rated.

Is it really possible to become fluent in 3 months? Probably yes, but not for everyone with every language, and it's definitely not easy. But that's not the point of Benny's site anyway. The point is that setting goals and not being afraid to speak are necessary to make real progress.

Tr*mp Reading List 2017

A reading list for this year, in order to educate myself about things I didn't realize were so important, and to be ready for the uncertain future. In no particular order.

----

It Can't Happen Here - Sinclair Lewis (1935)

Trump: The Art of the Deal - Donald J. Trump (1987)

Crippled America: How to Make America Great Again - Donald J. Trump (2014) 

An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States - Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz (2015)

Hillbilly Elegy - J. D. Vance (2016)

The Sellout - Paul Beatty (2015)

Brave New World - Aldous Huxley (1931)

What It Takes: The Way to the White House - Richard Ben Cramer (1992)

Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil - Hannah Arendt (1963)

Globalization and Its Discontents - Joseph E. Stiglitz (2002)

----

Examples of other reading lists:

http://www.fsgworkinprogress.com/2016/11/a-post-election-reading-list/

http://remezcla.com/lists/culture/stop-trump-reading-list/

https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2017/jan/20/recommended-reading-for-president-trump

and a collection of reading lists from vox:

http://www.vox.com/culture/2016/11/19/13676514/collection-reading-lists-prepare-age-trump

Walt Whitman "Leaves of Grass" Review from 2009

Walt Whitman is generally placed in the heart of the transcendentalism movement in American literature and at the beginnings of realism. This classification is unique as being a transcendentalist means to be independent and to be constantly seeking experiences, observations, and knowledge of the world. Whitman’s “Leaves of Grass” is a celebration of this adventure to discover the world, but is even more so an exposition of Whitman’s independence and the power of the self. Whitman is not afraid of addressing a topic, writing of everything from the virtues of manual labor to the beauty and worth of nature. When reading his words we not only realize that there is something to gain from everything around us, but also that within ourselves there is the ability to get something more out of life than we ever expected. “Leaves of Grass” is a testament to the ability of the individual, but it is also a stirring account of America in the 19th Century and an attempt to have an impact with poetry itself.

Fittingly “Leaves of Grass” was self-published in 1855 when no publisher showed any interest in this poetic attempt by Whitman, a fairly uneducated son of a farmer whose only experience was writing stories for multiple newspapers and publishing a few short stories that were not considered as exceptional. While Whitman kept writing he kept publishing. Up until his death Leaves of Grass was still being perfected with no less than eight official editions being made throughout the years. The work is an expression of Whitman’s own life, which he is constantly trying to redefine and discover again. Whitman asserts that his work is something that America needs. In “Shut Not Your Doors” he asserts that “For that which was lacking on all your well-fill’d shelves, yet needed most, I bring” (Book I. Shut Not Your Doors.2) (he is speaking to libraries specifically). Whitman truly believes that his work speaks of life and will aid those seeking something more out of life in a special way. He says “The words of my book nothing, the drift of it every thing.” (Book I. Shut Not Your Doors.5). Although all of this was written over a century ago, Whitman’s attempt to expound on the wonders of life in the 19th Century is certainly successful in its own right.

The book is divided into books that generally have their own topic or direction. Each book is either divided up into separately title poems or is subdivided with numbered poems that delineate thoughts. The books can be generally classified as being about a certain topic due to their titles and of course the topics addressed within; Book XIV: Song of the Redwood-Tree is about nature, Book XX: By the Roadside and Book VII: Song of the Open Road are poems of travel, Book XV: Song for Occupations and Book XII: Song of the Broad-Axe treat manual labor and the American worker. However, throughout all of these internal discussions there is a common thread of observation and experience.

Book II: Starting From Paumanok (Paumanok is a native American term for Long Island where Whitman was born) is an expression by Whitman of where he comes from, what he sees of life, why he went to write these poems, and what the reader will hopefully achieve from reading them. Book II is a microcosm of the book itself. It is a summary of the adventure of observing and experiencing life. It is clear that America is crucial to this adventure. America is the environment that formed Whitman in his young years and is the environment he has traveled through for years as an adult. America is the inspiration for much of his work, but also the intended audience. “Take my leaves America, take them South and take them North, / Make welcome for them everywhere, for they are your own off-spring” (Book II. 4.1-2). Whitman however does not ever discount anything in existence, always aware of something different:

“I will acknowledge contemporary lands,

I will trail the whole geography of the globe and salute courteously every city large and small,

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

And I will report all heroism from an American point of view.” (Book II.6.14-17)

This condition of being constantly aware of not only his surroundings, but of everything that exists there and elsewhere is a unique trait of Whitman. He is always aware of the history behind things, the men and women that have come before him and the people and places elsewhere in the world that he might never see all the while being constantly reminded that he cannot hide the influence that his great land America has had on his perception.

For Whitman something special can be found everywhere. Many poets concern themselves only with great questions about the nature of man and of the great philosophers and some only discuss very specific personal instances that seem to them to have more significance. Whitman does not make such decisions. Again just in Book II Whitman speaks of the most spiritual concerns of religion and devotion; “I say no man has ever yet been half devout enough, / None has ever yet adored or worship’d half enough,” (Book II.7.13-14). He speaks of love and its pains and joys; “Dear son do you think it is love?” (Book II.9.3). Still it is never discounted how important it is that “I have seen where the she-bird the mocking bird sat on her nest in the briers hatching her brood.” (Book II.11.2). It is the combination of him being constantly aware of what is in the world and also recognizing the significance of all that he finds that makes “Leaves of Grass” worthy of the purpose that it seeks to fulfill.

It is Whitman’s new personal and free verse style that for many has pushed his work behind the formed verse of Frost and others. However, Whitman’s constant honesty and personal touches to the poetry not only help to make it seem more accessible, but help to communicate the experiences that he has. This work is not a story, there are very few allegorical tools used, and the poems generally do not stray away from things that Whitman has seen firsthand. This style and method is much more efficient than the more classical method of using the complexity of poetic forms to communicate something that has no other means of being communicated. Some might say that the lack of form and literary tools in Whitman’s work diminishes its merit, but when Whitman went about to achieve this treatise on the world around us he relied on his senses and his experiences not on any advanced classical poetic skill. It is with almost raw passion that Whitman writes about the world. He says “I have hardly gone and hardly wish’d to go any farther, / But stop and loiter all the time to sing it in ecstatic songs.” (Book I. Beginning my Studies.5-6). Whitman clearly has the ability to write expressively and it is this skill and his passion that make “Leaves of Grass” unforgettable.

From every angle and in every form Whitman exclaims about the wonders of the world around him, but an even more expressive common theme is his belief in the ability of the individual to achieve what he is attempting in his work or to experience the world just as he has. Whitman begins this theme with a celebration of himself in “Song of Myself” (Book III). This section is not just about Whitman. It is not to gloat about certain abilities that he has or certain achievements he has made. “Song of Myself” is Whitman’s expression of joy at his ability to aggressively see and experience everything that there is in the world. The 15th poem of this book is a rapid enthralling list of actions and events that would be expected to happen all throughout not just the stereotypical American town or city, but all of America. Lines begin with “The pilot” (Book III.15.4) “The deacons” (Book III.15.7) “The young sister” (Book III.15.30) “The bride” (Book III.15.40) “The City” (Book III.15.61) and so on for close to seventy lines. It ends with “And these tend inward to me, and I tend outward to them, / And such as it is to be of these more or less I am, / And of these one and all I weave the song of myself.” (Book III.15.64-66). This song sets the stage for the myriad of discussions and observations that follow on over three hundred pages.

If only one thing can be brought from the “Song of Myself” is the belief that we can experience the same transcendence from every day events and hopefully get something more out of life. Whitman truly believes that the pursuits of everyday working Americans is worthy of praise. In “Pioneers! O Pioneers!” Whitman reveals his love and admiration for the hard work and dedication of the American pioneer. He says of the pioneers “So impatient, full of action, full of manly pride and friendship.” (Book XVII. Pioneers! O Pioneers!.8) and “O beloved race in all! O my breast aches with tender love for all!” (Book XVII. Pioneers! O Pioneers!.29). Whitman continually praises men of all occupations. Not just praising romanticized endeavors. In Book XV, “A Song for Occupations”, Whitman starts off stating “In the labor of engines and trades and the labor of fields I find the developments, / And find the eternal meanings.” (Book XV.1.2-3) and adding “You workwomen and workmen of these States having your own divine and strong life,” (Book XV.6.8). This admiration for the strong work heavy lives lead by so many Americans at that time is an empowering sentiment. Whitman does not see that life as futile like many intellectuals would. Much like his recognition of small events in nature as significant Whitman sees the worth of even the most toilsome occupation.

The reactions to Whitman’s “Leaves of Grass” were polar extremes. Some reacted violently opposite to it and some, like Emerson praised it as “The most extraordinary piece of wit and wisdom that America has yet contributed.” The later editions of “leaves of Grass” contain a large amount of civil war poetry. There are many poems specifically in honor of Abraham Lincoln including the famous “O Captain! My Captain!” (Book XXII). Additionally the so-called ‘deathbed’ edition includes many poems that are of a very different tone speaking of approaching death and the passing of time. The work must be viewed as what it is, a masterful attempt to engage America and to explore the experience of life through poetry. The work is an expression of Whitman’s life and because of that we can hope that it influences ours.

-Spencer Jolly, 2009

Sources

Goodmen, Russell. "Transcendentalism." Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University, 2008. Web. 14 Aug. 2009. .

Jeffares, Alexander N., and Gay W. Allen. "Walt(er) Whitman Biography." Biography.com. A&E Television Networks. Web. 13 Aug. 2009. .

Szczesiul, Anthony. Walt Whitman and the Development of Leaves of Grass. University of South Carolina, 1999. Web. 15 Aug. 2009. .

Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass. Radford, VA: Wilder Publications, 2007. Print.